Since presidential debates are to debating what pro wrestling is to wrestling, I'll agree. Everything goes, anyway. If we actually ran these like academic debates, only serious, thoughtful people would watch and what fun is that?

More seriously: how is the moderator going to be considered the accurate source?

Crowley made it clear: she's on Team Obama! No subtle bias, Romney was set up. BHO's manipulated his supporter's envy by targeting Romney's success, which was expected. An altogether brilliant glimpse into what's become of America's journalists.

Thats the PROBLEM CNN stands for Communist National Newsmen.

Ken, do you know the difference between socialism, communism, marxism, and fascism?

obama would be most be considered a fascist (lower case - f) as opposed to a socialist, a communist or a marxist. he is every bit as much of a tool of the banks as any of his predecessors.

@careless well hot damn. I reward you +1 points for knowing the difference as opposed to most people who throw the terms around. And yea, you're actually right. I'm just tired of people throwing out contradictory terms of what they think obama is without even knowing wtf they are talking about.

No, she was NOT correct, and she's finally admitted it today.
Romney was right, and Obama is a pathological liar.
CNN has a definite leftist bias.

Here is the quote from the President's speech in the rose garden. "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation". So Romney's attack on the President's words at the debate was wrong. Crowley was correct. When are you going to apologize to her?

Never because she was wrong. Obama referred to the youtube video at the UN weeks after. Still blaming the youtube video as a reason for the "unrest" Just because Obama added that little tag line does not change the facts of what his ambassador did on five talk shows, his SecState reiterated a few days later, and what he did at the UN a few days later. This guy simply does not want an American killed on on 9/11 in his campaign. He has a scandal on his hands, some kind of ???-gate. This will come out in the next foreign policy debate. Because the press will not cover another (fast and furious too) scandal. People died...Obama lied.

First of all, Crowley did NOT "backtrack" in the least. She explained what happened, explained how the President did, indeed, refer to the incident as an "act of terror" the day after. And the fact is that we are still uncovering details of exactly what happened - the most detailed account yet was published yesterday, and it actually confirmed that the attack WAS sparked by the Mohammed video on Youtube. Romney looked like an ass last night, like a deer in the headlights because he went off half-cocked and tried to make political points on a tragic event that nobody should try to leverage that way.

TG said:
Here is the quote from the President's speech in the rose garden. "No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation". So Romney's attack on the President's words at the debate was wrong. Crowley was correct. When are you going to apologize to her?
-----------------------------------------
Using the word "terror" once in a speech, but never saying that the consulate attack was planned terrorism... how is this anywhere near a refutation of what Romney said? While for two weeks the fiction of a video inspired demonstration is said to be the cause and promoted by the administration - When will some journalist insist on how this could be when there was absolutely NO indication of ANY protest before the attack started?

I LOVE the fact checking that happens post the debate and enjoy that commentary.

I'll be honest...I do not know the rules of a moderator in a town hall setting. I thought the moderator was more of an usher...go over here..go over there

Yeah but Candy Crowley's facts were wrong during the debate and she admitted such after. She backtracked quite a bit. So that said, and I am a Romney supporter. Other than the obvious admitted Libya cover-up fact check. I think she did okay. It was like herding cats.

No matter how many times this guy posts it, it is simply not true - Candy Crowley in no way "backtracked" and did not get anything wrong. Her facts were correct and she stood by them.

Bruce, watch Crowley in her own words ... Romney was right.

http://freebeacon.com/candy-crowley-he-was-right/

If you watched the debate, she first corrected Romney - who had claimed that the President did not call the attack "terrorism" - by agreeing with Obama that he had, indeed, referred to the attack as an "act of terror" the next day. And then she went on to say that there had been confusing reports of this protest over the Youtube clip which continued until the State Dept. reported that there had been no protest, and she told Romney that he was right on that part of it. But that part of it means virtually nothing - so what if there was no protest demonstration? It takes time to sort out the circumstances when you have an incident like this in a 3rd world, desert outpost. The main thing here is that Candy Crowley did NOT backtrack or take back anything she said in last night's debate. Because she was right. And so was President Obama.

Yeah, how do you find so many "independents" the theory is laughable. How many cowardly stupid people are there in Long Island?

If she checked both candidate's comments then why is it a question? A big issue in this election has been candidates misrepresenting the truth to try to sway voters in their direction. I call that cheating...seems logical that some fact-checking is an appropriate move in such an important debate. Good move, I say.

It's only a "good move" if she's right, which she wasn't.

Yikes! that's real depth there! she did no such thing, only Romney's. I call it cheating to have a two-on-one debate, both misrepresenting thre truth.

Romney was grandstanding, he was breaking the pre-agreed upon rules of the Town Hall and he was wrong. All of which made Crowley's fact check the right move - and no matter how many times the Romney crowd claims it wasn't true, it was absolultely, positively a fact. The day after the attack, the President called it an "act of terror." It just doesn't get any clearer than that.

Even Candy admitted Romney was right!

Romney was correct Obama never called this specific event an act of terrorism. What he said was that we would not tolerate acts of terror in general. Obama kept saying this specific event was a demenstration due to the video, now he's trying to cover his ass, but it's to late. Bottom line Obama = lack of leadership. Notice how Obama wanted no part of explaining fast and furious and the innocent lives lost. Four years of nothing is long enough it's time for him to go.

Baloney...or borrowing from Joe Biden, malarkey. The President doesn't just throw around a term like "act of terror" on a whim. His address in the Rose Garden specifically referred to the killing of our four Americans that way.

Bruce, if he knew it was an act of terror, which he didn't really say but you believe he did, they why for 2 weeks did he have his people say it was because of the video, and he himself at the UN said it was because of the video. He was either lying for 2 weeks or he jumped to conclusions just as he his accusing Romney of before all the facts were out. He and his team clearly tried to cover this up. He has no business being in that position, he wasn't qualified 4 years ago and he is still not qualified

Ordinarily, there would be no rush or pressure to make pubic the exact circumstances of the attack, but remember - Mitt Romney had politicized this event before we even knew the extend of the damage and that four Americans had been killed. Because Romney pushed this horrible attack into a political blame game, the Adminstration was forced to answer questions it no definite answers for. The most recent and most in-depth reports reveal that the video actually WAS to blame for the attack, even though there was no protest demonstration. And in the end, what does it really matter whether or not there was a protest? What matters is that the US is working to find the people who did this and bring them to justice - and after Obama's success against Bin Laden and dozens of other al-Qaeda leaders, I'm willing to trust that we will do just that.

If you actually read the transcript of the President's remarks on 09/12/2012, the paragraph preceding the 'terror' remark was a reference to 09/11/2001, not the murders of the four men in Libya. Five days after that, the Administration sent out a rep to five shows who when asked if it was an act of terror, the so-called video story was repeated. If after one day, let alone five days, the White House and staff still did mot know it was a terrorist act, then the security of our Country and citizens are all in trouble.

The President made comments last night about this one or that one "works for me", when in fact, they work for us, including him. That is one of his mistakes, he feels he is superior and his arrogance will be his undoing eventually.

And according to the latest and most detailed reporting on the attack which appeared yesterday, it WAS sparked by the movie clip. The only detail that was originally reported and turned out to be wrong was that there was a protest demonstration. There was no protest...but so what? It's not like this happened in some high-tech, urban area - it was a third world outpost in the middle of the desert; firm details take awhile to piece together. I'd expect somebody who wants to be President to understand that and not try to score cheap political points using the deaths of brave Americans.

there was a drone providing 24 hour surveilance

They knew in 24 hours that it was a planned terrorist attack..not a protest. Because of the delay of security changes..we lost another security member in Yemen recently. Just like fast and furious...People died...Obama lied.

Unfortunately we have to overplay our hand a little, because the press, just does not see a story here. They were in the tank in 2008 (self admitted) and they are now. (They will admit that around 2014 in a book)

It's not that obama down played the the attack, it's about that he lied and decieved americans. And your right the larger issue is the breach of security why did our so called commander in chief and secretery of state not respond when the embassy pleaded for more security.

Exactly, Amend. There were nine embassy attacks during the Bush adminstration -- NINE!!! And you didn't see this kind of political grandstanding from Democrats when they took place. Romney's politicizing of this incident is really disgraceful.

They actually knew in real time that there was no demonstration and that it was an orchestrated attack with heavy weapons. They had real time video from surveillance cameras.
The facts didn't fit with their al Queda has been decimated and is no longer a threat narrative, so they lied for to weeks, saying it was a "demonstration over the video that escalated spontaneously" and that they "had no evidence that it was a pre-planned attack." That's a blatant, deliberate lie, but the Obama administration has lying down to a science.

Carl, please quit trying to politicize the deaths of four brave Americans. It's shameful when it comes from your candidate and it's shameful when it comes from you, too.

No diplomats died in any of those attacks because the embassies were adequately protected. Obama's administration left the Libyan embassy essentially unprotected, and this resulted in the deaths of four.

It wasn't the Libyan embassy, it was a consulate hundreds of miles away from the embassy, which is in Tripoli. Benghazi is a remote desert city and we would never provide that facility with the kind of security we give to embassies, which is exactly why it was targeted.

I find it hypocritical that you would allow a president get away with a such an abdication of his duties. IF George W Bush was in the same boat..tell me honestly that you would not be demanding his head on a plate. People died....Obama lied.

Unfortunately life is distasteful sometimes. This event showed a lack of leadership by this administration and has to be exsposed.

Amen Amend! To Candy Crowely's credit she correctly and rightfully redirected the debate. She also clarified her statement regarding what President Obama said in the Rose Garden during the debate. Le Sheppard, in an earlier comment, has nailed it; don't look for your elected leaders to decide for us......me, you, and we need to direct our leaders. On that note, in terms of energy demand, not enough is being done by either you or I on addressing our energy use, implementing effecient technologies, avoiding further exponentially expensive and permanently damaging methods of extracting fossil energy stores. The American lives sacrificed in the Iraq War was about one thing...OIL. Remember that, please, next time you pull up to the pump. We have become a nation of mindless consumers and politicians are playing to it. Really people...wake up and stop thinking one of these two candidates has the effective economic answers and is going to get you a job next week, or bring oil prices down. All of us collectively drive this nations economy, if you don't like the China situation, stop buying their stuff - it's just stuff. Every fiber in Romney is working for the upper 1%, and they only give a shit about one thing...the bottom line. What is Romney going to do for you? He'll have you build that stage, then fire you after he has your vote. There is no trickle down from the top folks...the top could care less until you stop spending your money to pump up the 1%'s bottom line.

With due respect,mwould it also be an attempt to further ones political career by having a representative go on five Sunday News shows and continue to further the incorrect information that it was a protest against a video depicting Muslims in a bad light?

The Administration surely knew within those five days that it was an act of terrorism and their blatant misleading of the American public is shameful.

Is it furthering one's political career to make a false statement, not meet with Cabinet members immediately following the attack and instead get on Air Force One, head to Vegas then Colorado to pick up checks for a campaign?

"IF George W Bush was in the same boat..tell me honestly that you would not be demanding his head on a plate."

What? You mean if there was a terrorist attack on September 11th during Bush's presidency where there was tons of warnings beforehand and the actual event was shrouded in secrecy and confusion for a few weeks and was initially falsely tied to one militant middle eastern group before everyone realized it was actually a totally different militant middle eastern group? That kind of 'same boat'? Wow. Just... wow.

I'm confused ... It's OK to criticize Romney for what most thought was a gaffe on the Libyan embassy attack; but it distasteful for anyone to criticize the Obama Administration's failure to anticipate it or to react to warnings provided by the Libyan government itself?

I find both lines of argument to be foolish distractions. The attack is a political issue, of course Romney's going to politicize it. The attack was obviously terrorism, of course Obama's not going to emphasize that. Is anybody actually surprised by any of that? Let's talk about their plans for laws and policies, spell out the loopholes, look over the hard numbers - not all this bullshit about Biden's smirk and Romney's dog and what person said a particular word first.

Guys, it's all about political agendas and masking the true reasons we as a nation are targets. These trivial details mask the root of all these issues. Our failed foreign policy. Arm twisting and intervention has unintended consequences, or blowback. This blowback is a common feature of most if not all federal policies. In the case of our security at home, we are the authors of these attacks. Why would a person suspect otherwise? As the most ruthless terrorist on the planet, why do we expect to not be terrorized in return? All the warfare-welfare state can do is to print more money to fund this illegal, immoral, unconstitutional activitity and use war propaganda, wrapped in the flag, to deceive the masses. For sixty years it's worked. Most voters continue to be duped, however, for a growing minority, the sad and pathetic lies are recognized.

More partisan crap. The moderator intentionally made it look like Romney was overstepping - and yet, Obama ended up with a full 3 minutes more air time than Romney.

Obama did better this time around, but his record still betrays him. Because the press said he won is suspect at best. If he did just a little better than a doormat they would have claimed he won. But he did do better. the foreign policy head to head should be really good.

Beth, be careful, that kool-aid isn't good for your health.

Beth Norquist,

Obama spoke of his many accomplishments......LOL..... His many accomplishments such as hiring the largest white house staff (personal staff), spending more on family and friends vacations, increasing the national debt more then anyone in history, making the economy worse, and providing more public assistance and give a ways. I can see where he should be so proud.

Saying Romney would end Planned Parenthood, a private organization, is an absurd lie.

Yes, and Obama did his best to deflect attention away from the issue - hypocracy.

That would be interesting to see the candidates investments, I know Romney is wealthy and Obama is no pauper. I wonder if either of them are invested in some really lurid companies. Good scandal-ly stuff.

Where are Romney's tax returns for 2000-2010? Why won't he release them?

Because the law says he doesn't have to. Where's Obama's college transcripts? Answer: none of your business, because he doesn't have to show them to you.

It may not be required by law, but he should do what every other candidate -- including his own father -- does routinely.

From Look Magazine, December 1967, an article about George Romney:

"'He balked when I badgered him for a copy of his latest Form 1040, the Federal Individual Income Tax Return,' Harris wrote. “Release of the document, while it might serve a political purpose, would not prove very much, he argued. One year could be a fluke, perhaps done for show, and what mattered in personal finance was how a man conducted himself over the long haul.” …

“Stumped by this argument, I was not prepared for the move that it eventually led him to make: He ordered up all the Form 1040′s that he and Mrs. Romney had filed over the past twelve years — including those profitable ones from when he saved the American Motors Company from bankruptcy and became a millionaire on the company’s stock options.”

well that's just nonsense ...stop that crap.

Obama's race (mixed) doesn't bother me. His big government, fascist, socialist ideology is the problem.
Leave the racist comments out of this. They only demean YOU.

Please explain how he's fascist AND socialist. Other than just spouting off the same junk that Christine O'Donnell and Rush Limbaugh vomit to the airwaves.

Yes he does own those...he is the President, just as Obama owns those in LIbya, Mexico, Egypt, and Yemen. I comprehend the challenge in battling terrorists. But a simple one is..put guns in the towers...in Libya where the enemy is. It was a failure on Obama's policies. Bush lived in pre 9/11...Obama lives in post 9/11...big difference.

As for Iraq war. Bush, Pelosi, Reid and Biden, all saw they same intel. They all voted to go. So Bush as President gets the blame, as it should be. But the leadership of the Dems are not innocent here.

Carlito, you bring up some great points. Just a few questions. How many rich people went bakrupt under the Obama regime? How many MORE middle class people are struggling after 4 years of Obama? If Romney is such a "jackass CEO", how come he has more money than me, you and your entire family times 10? Rather than tell everyone what Romney will do (like Hussein did all last night), try listening to his message. It is easy for somebody on a stage to say "that wont work", but its a hell of a lot easier to actually SEE, by opening your eyes and ears, and hear the challenges Americans are facing under Obama. He has had 4 years of DICTATING to us his policy....and is it helping the middle class? It hasnt helped me, and I make well under $200,000/year. TAx break? I dint see any tax break. Point is, Obama SPEAKS a good game.....Fact is, WHAT HAS HE DONE to help the middle class? NOTHING! As for Foreign policy, it took Obama 2 weeks to recognize publicly it was a terroristic event, yet last night he claimed he knew it the next day. Stop getting "jerked around"....start LOOKING and LISTENING to the American Middle Class.....its worse, not better!

Finally, do you really care what what a billionaire makes or pays in taxes, or are you more concerned for your job security, ability to feed your family and how you can provide for your family. Billionaires have been skirting taxes for longer than I have been alive, and will continue to do so because they make the rules!

You're right: Obama didn't jump the gun and declare it a terrorist attack. Instead, he thoughtfully waited a day to declare it the fault of a video and imply that perhaps free speech should be curtailed so that we don't offend any murderous Islamists.

Well actually I do place some blame on Bush for 9/11. If he had the intel as you said but was choosing the path of his father by building coalitions then he was a fool. But pre 9/11...post 9/11, the thinking has changed. Obama has had unecessary and avoidable blood spilled due to his (buck stopping and all that) liberalized foreign security policies.

Right Bush should have taken some responsibility just as Obama should now. The problem is there is nothing we can do about the bush years they are over and done with but there is something we can do about Obama, vote him out. Romney might not make a great president heck he might not even make a average president but after four years of poor leadership it's time to move forward. They say stupidity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result, Obama had his chance and failed, lets wish him luck and move on.

It's funny I feel like I know everything...then I meet my opponents...good sport.

co2....agreed, it is not an election issue, but national security and foreign policy are most definitely election issues. How one is judged should not be placed equally by words versus actions. Obama initially could have said we are awaiting details....no apology, no need to make a video....just get the facts. WHat severly hurt him were his actions, PERIOD. He had an international issue that should have been priority 1, and he went to Vegas, Jay Z and Letterman. I am certain he had hourly updates....but when your Commanbder in Chief is politicking and socializing (with those greedy 1%ers he is always waiving his finger at), then as an American, I become concerned, thereby making it political. If Benghazi occured last year, or 2009, no issue. But in the middle of the largest watched political campaign known to mankind, you expect a little more than what he offered. I hope this "intelligence community" that he blames (or at least did at 1 time) will give us better than 2 week notice when Iran goes nuclear!

I agree with that comment, maybe Obama and Biden just have more hot air? Anyways, aside from some of the obvious bias, I think Crowley did okay..like I said before...herding cats.

I don't want to turn this into a "no true Scotsman" argument, but to be fair I don't see how a 90% top income tax rate is very Republican.

Marc.....Classic .....you are classic.....ya know when your side complains about "CONTEXT"? If you actually copied the ENTIRE speech, (as we are finding out that is exactly what it was, yet another speech), you will see that Obama spoke of the 9/11 attacks and the "incident". Cover all you want, he by no means the day after the TERRORISTIC ATTACK called it a terroristic attack...thats why it was impossible to go on Letterman and the View and call it a TERRORISTIC ATTACK......especially when his UN girl spent all day the following Sunday calling it a protest....and then he went to the UN and referred to a video.....so, c'mon Marc, protecting the President is patriotic, there wasnt anyone from the White House or the Obama administration who said terroristic attack until the guy who testified before congress! Making one's own reality isnt patriotic, its called lying!

And I cannot wait until Sunday night.....@ 8PM, the night before the Prez will have to spend the ENTIRE 90 minutes defending foreign policy, how friendly he and "Bibi" are, how much he has done for Israel, him reminding us (AGAIN) Osama is dead. See, some time on Sunday, the Obama Administration will need to try to FIX history...(ie Hillary swallowing the pill at 7PM Monday night)...its all about BOB AND WEAVE and dancing....bring your dizzy pills next Monday, because Ali and Astaire will certainly see moves they never dreamt of by the Prez......it will certainly be entertaining!

The conservative right keeps saying he refused to call it the act of terrorists until two weeks after it happened. I gave you the proof that he said it was the very next day. If your reading comprehension isn't strong enough to discern that from what I posted I can't really do anything else for you, John.

Both sides tell half-truths and twist words to benefit their side. What I've seen so far is that Romney's side has told far more lies and given way fewer details on the numbers he's touting as fact.

I watched the post debate coverage of Fox News of the supposedly "independent" focus group. It was like watching one of those Ron Popeil infomercials for the Magic Bullet blender. Everyone in the focus group was so obviously there to demand that Romney won the debate by a mile that it was downright comical. I kept looking for the old lady with rollers in her hair to talk about the smoothest chicken salad she'd ever eaten.

So were exactly did he call it a terrorist attack????

Me: "I had a sandwich today for lunch made with peanut butter. I also contained jelly."

Republican: "Yes, but where did you say you had a peanut butter & jelly sandwich!??!" *aneurysm*

Ron, do you live under a rock? The clip has been played thousands of times over the past 12 hours on every news network and most political websites. Except, of course, any conservative conspiracy theory websites who will pretend that it didn't happen, just like they did when Obama had provided his birth certificate and they would look away and say "I have never seen any birth certificate."

lol. not yet watts but if after four more years of Obama america becomes a country where big government runs peoples lives from cradle to casket and tells people what to do and when they can do it and tells them they know best how to spend their money i might just look for a nice cozy rock to crawl under because i would be embarrassed to see what our once great nation had become.

Marc.....unbeliveable. Best thing you said was you cannot do anything else for me. So if Iran attains chemicals, but the other little thing is PLUTONIUM, its ok, because it just along with your peanut butter? The man went on multiple (taped) television shows and NEVER used the word Terror, except in an answer to an inquiry. I am done but I will reference this comment as to the fact that I am an expert in chemical warfare, because I simply used the word Plutonium within a sentence. There, I am covered!

Only a Republican can criticize Obama for calling something an attack and moments later mentioning that it was perpetrated by terrorists for not using the specific words "terrorist attack" -- give me a break.

He's an internet troll that was either weaned from his mother's teat too soon or stayed latched on far too long. Pay him as much mind as you would a crackhead on the street and your experience here will be far more enriching.

co2,
We can banter back and forth @ 9/11, you blaming Bush, and I blaming Clinton for having zero foreign policy for 8 years, by reducing our military by 50%. But the issue you raise, which I believe to be valid is Romney's foreign policy experience. I dont think you will argue with the fact that Romney has a considerably stronger understanding of economy over Obama. Look what Obama has done with the US economy, since 2009? Destroyed it! Aa far as your concerns regarding foreign policy, your concerns mimic my concerns in 2008 with ANY experience with Obama....I mean what exactly has the man ever successfully done in his entire life with regardto running a business, a country or a lemonade stand for that matter? We give him the keys to running the most powerful country in the world. Oh then Dems place a checkstrap on him, naming every Clinton cabinet member to keep the 'new kid' in line. What does Obama do? He begins believing his own press clippings - A Nobel Peace Prize 3 months out of the gate??? SERIOUSLY!? Point is this guy has no experience in anything, and has proven it by his selections of associates, his circumvention of the Constitution, his COMPLETE lack of control of his people (Way to long to list here). Bottom line, does Romney have years of foreign policy? No, but he has about as much as Obama did when he took office. Thats why I am focussing on domestic strength, hoping Romney will make smart selections regarding his cabinet. He, after all is a CEO

Blowback from our foreign policy caused 9-11, and will continue to cause further attacks. Our foreign policy makes us less safe and more likley to be targets, while bankrupting our country. National security is mostly war propaganda, designed to rape your Constitution and steal your freedom.

Or, we can have Obama fix the 46%'s. Oh wait, now it's 47... 48... 49... oh look, now the majority is on public assistance and paying no taxes! I wonder who they will vote for now!

co2

If that is what you really think fine but it would be more than Obama fixed with the economy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I would call him an Obama impersonator....

Wow only three trues out of sixteen issues mostly false or half true. Even mostly true is pretty sad. There should be a spot on the ballot to vote for none of the above !!!!

Wrong.

Best get your LDL, HDL, and HbgA1c checked Crestor Januvia. You may have excess plaque inhibiting your cerebral function,and or hepatic encephalopathy.

Crestor Januvia,

Well said....couldn't agree more.

Are you capable of any post that isn't meant to insult?

"I like how this turd says..."

"...I understand that, you dolt."

"Moron... "

"I yelled at an old lady today."

"Go away you liberal loser."

"Liberals are like maggots...."

And all of that is just from a very modest scroll through your posts. I feel bad if this is how you go through life. It must be a lonely existence. And for somebody to respond to one of your posts by saying "well said" is equally sad.

Unfortunately Candy admitted later that Romney was correct!

Careful talk like this will get you a crazy peanut butter and jelly sandwich anology or maybe someone will accuse you of living under a rock.

Did you see how fast Obama shut up when romney brought up fast and furious he did not want any part of it. I think he saw visions of impeachment dancing around in his head.

Now that... that just isn't right...

Roman, do you have anything compelling or interesting to offer other than your intellect, or lack of, only serves to represent the run of the mill Romney supporter?

foxnews viewers were also the least informed ....
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2011/11/21/fox-news-viewers-uninformed-npr-listeners-not-poll-suggests/

Hardly
http://www.freakonomics.com/2012/02/16/how-biased-is-your-media/

And Rupert Murdoch's Fox network is in cahoots with Romney/Koch Bros. Inc. (A.K.A. Americans for prosperity).

How comfortable is your tin foil hat?

and good old mitt and his family might be involved in a ponzi scheme....those cronies!!!

http://www.dailypaul.com/230720/romney-son-investigated-for-8-billion-ponzi-scheme

Agreed, though I would argue that any president can actually achieve what he sets out to do. He does not act alone but has the House, Senate etc. And don't forget the insurance industry, pharmaceutical companies, the federal reserve and the Banksters.

I agree, Gary Johnson is the best choice this November.

Yikes!,

You have one thing right....the rest of the world is watching. Watching to see if we are stupid enough to go another 4 years with Obama..... just say NO to Obama.......

you know...if it were Obama v. Johnson or Obama v. Ron Paul....they would win by landslide....but no....we got Mitt....the flippiest floppiest of them all...doesn't have a backbone and was bashing 47% then stood by his words before apologizing for what he said, was anti gun, now pro gun, was pro national healthcare, now against national healthcare, is pro wealth redistribution (anytime you take from someone like he says in his medicare plan and give to someone else = wealth redistribution. Lets face it....Mitt is a liberal and if all he can run on is he was a successful business man? well there was even a better successful business man. his name was Bernie Madoff...made ALOT more money and created tons of jobs....guess he can run for President too. oh by the way Mitt might be involved in his own ponzi

http://www.dailypaul.com/230720/romney-son-investigated-for-8-billion-ponzi-scheme

Becky,
Candy Crowley made sure her audience knew her truth…because after the debate she was interviewed and changed her comment. She discussed the facts as she wanted them to be…so bias and one sided. You are one of the many that ignores the lies and then spreads the crap along. No one has told more lies to this nation then Obama unless you consider all the broken promises not lies. You say Ann is staying at home figuring out how to not pay taxes, while Mrs. Obama, her kids and her friends are off vacationing all around the world on our tax dollars…. How did you like all those vacations you paid for last year???? Did you have a good time??? Was it worth all your hard earned money for the Obama family and friends to travel first class???? As for Romney not working…..tell us one job that Obama had that was not paid by tax dollars??? Before you can be the stick up Romney’s a** you need to get your head out of your own a**!!!!!

Becky......you make EXCELLENT POINTS! You and your husband work 70 hours/week, pay 30% taxes.....now here is the big question.....and WHO is the President? Because YOU and YOUR husband are PAYING 30% under OBAMA....and I am here to tell you with OBAMACARE, its going to get worse.....much worse!

Here is my point, take it for what it's worth.....OBAMA has done NOTHING to the wealthy, NOTHING. Biden was 1000% correct, the middle class has been getting HAMMERED thes elast 4 years.....know any millionaires who are no longer millionaires? Me niether. OBAMA tells you he is out to help you, but the only class that has done WORSE under OBAMA has been the middle class. Poor get free stuff, rich stay rich....middle class gets HAMMERED.

You epitomize what OBAMA is doing to the middle class, yet you still drink what he has been pouring since 2008.... is he REALLY helping you......according to you, NO....but beware the nasty Romney......look at the person in the mirror. Is she happy after 4 years of Obama and finger pointing? She doesnt sound happy!

John,
You are right….things over the past 4 years have been much worse for the middle class…while the poor have more programs to help them not need to work….free stuff…. Obamacare will hurt the middle class and small business more than anyone else…… My wife and I work more then one job to pay our bill, send our kids to school and are told that we don’t qualify for financial aide (for college), and even worse my son works part-time and is told he makes too much money for financial aide also. However, the public assistance people and illegal immigrants get all kinds of aide…. Obama MUST GO!!!!!!!

You are so right , Why is it so hard for the other side to see this point ?

That's a real intelligent argument...but with a name like "Kenya is not part of the USA" I should expect just drivel and insults from a username like that. What a troll!

Speaking of being a human wind-sock, let's check out The President's reaction to the Gay Marraige question. Never had a single word to say about it, because he KNEW much of his constituency (religious A-A and Hispanics) DID NOT SUPPORT the concept!

Then along comes Joe "Shoot-from-the-hip" Biden, who outs The President's position prematurely apparently. (My guess is The President didn't want to back out of the closet until AFTER November 6.)

Suddenly, The President's position on gay marriage is PUSHED out into the light of day ... and just DAYS before a planned Hollywood (hotbed of gay activism) fund raiser on George Clooney's tennis courts.

What's a President to do?!? Why, go along with the breeze (wind sock, remember?) and the campaign checking account, and viola'! The day before the Clooney fundraiser ... SUDDEN ENLIGHTENMENT!!

And who's a windsock?!?

Great way to avoid the issue entirely...seems some things never change with the GOP lately.
If you can't answer the question....avoid it and change the subject.

i pay LOTS of taxes but don't cry about it, Or act selfishly even though I am doing well..you and your like still want to blame everything on the 47% less fortunate...those you seem to hold in contempt such as Service people and veterans, the elderly and the poor, etc...
I have always worked, I have never taken from the Government and always supported my family and unlike you ,,,"Kenya whatever your name is",...I also understand that we are ALL AMERICANS. We should be thankful for this country and do all we can to help those less fortunate.
That's the right thing to do (but the GOP now makes selfishness a virtue, it's in your platform, you should be ashamed of that but are proud of it instead!)
You probably call yourself a Christian too, huh??
Go read what Jesus said about how to treat the poor (he WAS ONE!)
But Christian or not...you are selfish and it obvious you think that's ok, Since you got yours...screw everyone else, right? You and your fellow Republicans should be ashamed of yourselves...but it seems you have no shame!
(And I'm not 100% sure but I don't think you can buy cigarettes and beer with food stamps genius! But why bother with FACTS, right??)